linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH-cgroup 0/2] cgroup/cpuset: Account for boot time isolated CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zszim7DjSPdQn7Ie@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 10:16:27 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-cgroup 0/2] cgroup/cpuset: Account for boot time isolated
 CPUs

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 03:41:23PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> 
> On 8/26/24 15:05, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello, Waiman.
> > 
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 03:01:21PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > > Ping! Any comment on these patches?
> > cgroup side looks fine to me. Ping isol people?
> 
> This patchset is specific to cpuset code and doesn't touch any isolation
> code at all. My other isolation related patch series [1] does have a
> dependency on this one to work correctly.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240821142312.236970-1-longman@redhat.com/

Oh, I was confused of the two patchsets. I thought the second one was the
replacement for this one. Will take another look.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun