[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240826132311.igliqicrydtifp2s@lcpd911>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:53:11 +0530
From: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
To: Bryan Brattlof <bb@...com>
CC: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero
Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p: add opp frequencies
Hi Bryan,
On Aug 23, 2024 at 16:54:30 -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> ONe power management technique available to the Cortex-A53s is their
s/ONe/One
> ability to dynamically scale their frequency across the device's
> Operating Performance Points (OPP)
>
> The OPPs available for the Cortex-A53s on the AM62Px can vary based on
> the silicon variant used. The SoC variant is encoded into the
> WKUP_MMR0_WKUP0_CTRL_MMR0_JTAG_USER_ID register which is used to limit
> the OPP entries the SoC supports. A table of all these variants can be
> found in its data sheet[0] for the AM62Px processor family.
Error 404! Not found [0] ;)
>
> Add the OPP table into the SoC's ftdi file along with the syscon node to
What is ftdi?
> describe the WKUP_MMR0_WKUP0_CTRL_MMR0_JTAG_USER_ID register to detect
> the SoC variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@...com>
> ---
> .../boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-wakeup.dtsi | 5 +++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p5.dtsi | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-wakeup.dtsi
> index 315d0092e7366..6f32135f00a55 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-wakeup.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-wakeup.dtsi
> @@ -20,6 +20,11 @@ chipid: chipid@14 {
> bootph-all;
> };
>
> + opp_efuse_table: syscon@18 {
> + compatible = "ti,am62-opp-efuse-table", "syscon";
Huh, curious why I don't see this particular compatible in am62 itself..
Also, I am still not clear where this discussion got left off: (If it's
related)
https://lore.kernel.org/all/5chxjwybmsxq73pagtlw4zr2asbtxov7ezrpn5j37cr77bmepa@fejdlxomfgae/
In AM625, I see
k3-am625.dtsi:111: col 14: syscon = <&wkup_conf>;
But the approach you've used here seems different. Is there a
justification given on which one should be used/why somewhere that I can
refer?
> + reg = <0x18 0x4>;
> + };
> +
> cpsw_mac_syscon: ethernet-mac-syscon@200 {
> compatible = "ti,am62p-cpsw-mac-efuse", "syscon";
> reg = <0x200 0x8>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p5.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p5.dtsi
> index 41f479dca4555..140587d02e88e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p5.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p5.dtsi
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ cpu0: cpu@0 {
> d-cache-line-size = <64>;
> d-cache-sets = <128>;
> next-level-cache = <&l2_0>;
> + operating-points-v2 = <&a53_opp_table>;
> clocks = <&k3_clks 135 0>;
> };
>
> @@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ cpu1: cpu@1 {
> d-cache-line-size = <64>;
> d-cache-sets = <128>;
> next-level-cache = <&l2_0>;
> + operating-points-v2 = <&a53_opp_table>;
> clocks = <&k3_clks 136 0>;
> };
>
> @@ -77,6 +79,7 @@ cpu2: cpu@2 {
> d-cache-line-size = <64>;
> d-cache-sets = <128>;
> next-level-cache = <&l2_0>;
> + operating-points-v2 = <&a53_opp_table>;
> clocks = <&k3_clks 137 0>;
> };
>
> @@ -92,10 +95,54 @@ cpu3: cpu@3 {
> d-cache-line-size = <64>;
> d-cache-sets = <128>;
> next-level-cache = <&l2_0>;
> + operating-points-v2 = <&a53_opp_table>;
> clocks = <&k3_clks 138 0>;
> };
> };
>
> + a53_opp_table: opp-table {
> + compatible = "operating-points-v2-ti-cpu";
> + opp-shared;
> + syscon = <&opp_efuse_table>;
> +
> + opp-200000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <200000000>;
> + opp-supported-hw = <0x01 0x0007>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <6000000>;
> + };
> +
> + opp-400000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>;
> + opp-supported-hw = <0x01 0x0007>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <6000000>;
> + };
> +
> + opp-600000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
> + opp-supported-hw = <0x01 0x0007>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <6000000>;
> + };
> +
> + opp-800000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <800000000>;
> + opp-supported-hw = <0x01 0x0007>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <6000000>;
> + };
> +
> + opp-1000000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>;
> + opp-supported-hw = <0x01 0x0006>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <6000000>;
> + };
> +
> + opp-1250000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1250000000>;
> + opp-supported-hw = <0x01 0x0004>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <6000000>;
> + opp-suspend;
> + };
> + };
> +
--
Best regards,
Dhruva
Powered by blists - more mailing lists