[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zs4HCZH3M9nRXUvu@sunil-laptop>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 22:34:09 +0530
From: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@...storrent.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] RISC-V: ACPI: Add external interrupt controller
support
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 06:20:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 11:22 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26 2024 at 19:27, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 7:22 PM Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
> > >> There will be a conflict in PLIC irqchip driver due to a recent patch [1].
> > >> This patch is not in latest RC5 release but in linux-next. I usually base the
> > >> series on latest RC release. Should I rebase to linux-next in this case
> > >> and send the next revision of the series resolving the conflict?
> > >
> > > No, please don't.
> > >
> > > That will be resolved at the merge time.
> >
> > Alternatively you can pull
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git irq-urgent-2024-08-25
> >
> > which I'm about to send to Linus latest tomorrow morning. That contains
> > the conflicting change.
>
> So I've applied the series on top of the above.
>
Thanks!
> This included a full-swing rebase of the last patch, which I hope I've
> done correctly, but Sunil please see
>
Yeah, sorry about that. You have resolved most of the conflicts but few
are missing (which were not obvious anyway). Could you please take below
commit and squash?
https://github.com/vlsunil/linux/commit/c85f9d0dc31c0e77916ecdbb457748c05cf4e75a
Thanks!
Sunil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists