[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9881058a-5897-4f01-a5ed-7ae6c58b0906@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:36:03 +0530
From: MANISH PANDEY <quic_mapa@...cinc.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley"
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen"
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
<quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>, <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>,
<quic_bhaskarv@...cinc.com>, <quic_narepall@...cinc.com>,
<quic_rampraka@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Apply DELAY_AFTER_LPM quirk for
Toshiba devices
On 8/21/2024 3:05 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 8/20/24 5:37 AM, Manish Pandey wrote:
>> + { .wmanufacturerid = UFS_VENDOR_TOSHIBA,
>> + .model = UFS_ANY_MODEL,
>> + .quirk = UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_AFTER_LPM },
>
> Isn't three patches a bit much for these changes? I think all three
> patches can be combined into a single patch without making it harder for
> reviewers to understand what is going on.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
>
Thanks Bart for quick review.
I will merge all 3 changes to a single change in next patch set [V2].
Regards
Manish
Powered by blists - more mailing lists