[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7527d15c-9318-47f7-99f8-028c865a698b@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 14:35:22 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Manish Pandey <quic_mapa@...cinc.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_cang@...cinc.com,
quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com, quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com,
quic_bhaskarv@...cinc.com, quic_narepall@...cinc.com,
quic_rampraka@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Apply DELAY_AFTER_LPM quirk for
Toshiba devices
On 8/20/24 5:37 AM, Manish Pandey wrote:
> + { .wmanufacturerid = UFS_VENDOR_TOSHIBA,
> + .model = UFS_ANY_MODEL,
> + .quirk = UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_AFTER_LPM },
Isn't three patches a bit much for these changes? I think all three
patches can be combined into a single patch without making it harder for
reviewers to understand what is going on.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists