lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240827005114.4950-1-00107082@163.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:51:14 +0800
From: David Wang <00107082@....com>
To: miriam.rachel.korenblit@...el.com,
	kvalo@...nel.org,
	johannes.berg@...el.com,
	gregory.greenman@...el.com,
	pagadala.yesu.anjaneyulu@...el.com,
	dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
	daniel.gabay@...el.com
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Wang <00107082@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] wifi: iwlwifi: acpi/dsm: cache error retcode for iwl_acpi_get_dsm

On some HW, acpi _DSM query would failed for iwlwifi device
and everytime when network is reactiaved (boot,
suspend/resume, manually restart network, etc.),
bunch of kernel warning shows up together:
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
  ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
since iwlwifi would make 8 acpi/dsm queries for lari config.
But for iwlwifi, it is safe to cache the _DSM errors,
since it is not possible to correct it without upgrading BIOS.
With this patch, those kernel warnings would only show up once when
booting the system and unnecessary acpi/dsm queries are avoid.

Signed-off-by: David Wang <00107082@....com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c
index 79774c8c7ff4..3f98f522daac 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ static const size_t acpi_dsm_size[DSM_FUNC_NUM_FUNCS] = {
 	[DSM_FUNC_ENABLE_11BE] =		sizeof(u32),
 };
 
+static int acpi_dsm_func_retcode[DSM_FUNC_NUM_FUNCS] = {0};
+
 static int iwl_acpi_get_handle(struct device *dev, acpi_string method,
 			       acpi_handle *ret_handle)
 {
@@ -169,6 +171,10 @@ int iwl_acpi_get_dsm(struct iwl_fw_runtime *fwrt,
 	if (WARN_ON(func >= ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_dsm_size)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* If HW return an error once, do not bother try again. */
+	if (acpi_dsm_func_retcode[func])
+		return acpi_dsm_func_retcode[func];
+
 	expected_size = acpi_dsm_size[func];
 
 	/* Currently all ACPI DSMs are either 8-bit or 32-bit */
@@ -177,6 +183,7 @@ int iwl_acpi_get_dsm(struct iwl_fw_runtime *fwrt,
 
 	ret = iwl_acpi_get_dsm_integer(fwrt->dev, ACPI_DSM_REV, func,
 				       &iwl_guid, &tmp, expected_size);
+	acpi_dsm_func_retcode[func] = ret;
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.39.2


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ