linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT net-next] net: stmmac: drop the ethtool begin() callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240828143541.254436-1-d.dolenko@metrotek.ru>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 17:35:41 +0300
From: Dmitry Dolenko <d.dolenko@...rotek.ru>
To: ahalaney@...hat.com
Cc: alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	joabreu@...opsys.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	quic_abchauha@...cinc.com,
	quic_scheluve@...cinc.com,
	system@...rotek.ru,
	Dmitry Dolenko <d.dolenko@...rotek.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT net-next] net: stmmac: drop the ethtool begin() callback

Are there any updates on this topic?

We are faced with the fact that we can not read or change settings of
interface while it is down, and came up with the same solution for this
problem.

I do not know if Reviewed-by and Tested-by are suitable for patch marked as
RFC but I will post mine in case it is acceptable here.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolenko <d.dolenko@...rotek.ru>
Tested-by: Dmitry Dolenko <d.dolenko@...rotek.ru>