linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests/arm64: Fix build warnings for abi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aa014f33-acad-415e-a0fe-66687226e997@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:19:29 +0530
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: shuah@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Catalin.Marinas@....com,
 broonie@...nel.org, ryan.roberts@....com, Anshuman.Khandual@....com,
 aneesh.kumar@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/arm64: Fix build warnings for abi


On 8/27/24 18:03, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 10:48:51AM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
>> A "%s" is missing in ksft_exit_fail_msg(); instead, use the newly
>> introduced ksft_exit_fail_perror(). Also, uint64_t corresponds to
>> unsigned 64-bit integer, so use %lx instead of %llx.
> What's wrong with using %llx for a uint64_t? I think that part of the
> code is fine as-is.

I get a lot of warnings like these:
https://www.codedump.xyz/cpp/Zs6d7saC1IRuWV2O

>
> Will