linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] nvme-pci: add NVME_QUIRK_BOGUS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240828110239.hnljbiow2zbaduhu@ArmHalley.local>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 13:02:39 +0200
From: "javier.gonz@...sung.com" <javier.gonz@...sung.com>
To: Saeed Mirzamohammadi <saeed.mirzamohammadi@...cle.com>
CC: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Keith Busch
	<kbusch@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Sagi Grimberg
	<sagi@...mberg.me>, "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] nvme-pci: add NVME_QUIRK_BOGUS_NID for Samsung
 PM173X

On 27.08.2024 19:08, Saeed Mirzamohammadi wrote:
>Hi Pankaj/Samsung team,
>
>Sorry for pulling up an old thread. Has this been fixed in the
>firmware? If not, we could fix this issue with quirk for now until it’s
>resolved on the firmware side.

Saeed,

I believe we had concluded that this was a _requested_ feature by
specific customers. Therefore, we would not work on an upstream quirk.

Did I misunderstand?

Thanks,
Javier

>
>Thanks,
>Saeed
>
>
>> On Apr 27, 2023, at 12:37 AM, Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christoph,
>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 07:12:59AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 02:26:04PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> Can you send a patch with a new quirk that just disables the EUI64,
>>>> but keeps the NGUID?
>>>
>>> Did this go anywhere?
>> We had a discussion about this internally with our firmware team, and it
>> looks like these firmware were given to specific customers based on
>> mutual agreement. They are already in discussion with our firmware team
>> regarding this.
>>
>> I don't think this should go into as a generic quirk in Linux for these
>> models.
>