[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024082937-grandpa-sliceable-40ce@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 15:47:07 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, linan122@...wei.com, dsterba@...e.com,
song@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
christian.brauner@...ntu.com, keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/321] 6.1.107-rc1 review
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 01:37:40PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.107 release.
> > There are 321 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
> I believe these have problems:
>
> > Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> > net: don't dump stack on queue timeout
>
> This does not fix bug and will cause surprises for people parsing
> logs, as changelog explains
And as the changelog explains, this fixes one of the most reported
syzbot issues around, and as such, qualifies for a stable tree
inclusion. Please be more through in your reviews. Same goes for the
others "reported" here.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists