linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ethernet: marvell: Use min macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240829180525.GW1368797@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 19:05:25 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Yan Zhen <yanzhen@...o.com>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, marcin.s.wojtas@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ethernet: marvell: Use min macro

On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 11:19:06AM +0800, Yan Zhen wrote:
> Using the real macro is usually more intuitive and readable,
> When the original file is guaranteed to contain the minmax.h header file
> and compile correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yan Zhen <yanzhen@...o.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Rewrite the subject.
> - Using umin() instead of min().

Sorry for not noticing this in my review of v1, but, looking at git
history, I think the prefix for the subject of this patch should be
"net: mvneta: " rather than "ethernet: "

	Subject: net: mvneta: ...

-- 
pw-bot: cr