[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtDXkZQh689PGtrb@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 23:18:25 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, ang.iglesiasg@...il.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, biju.das.jz@...renesas.com,
javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com, semen.protsenko@...aro.org,
579lpy@...il.com, ak@...klinger.de, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] iio: pressure: bmp280: Add support for bmp280
soft reset
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 09:00:04PM +0200, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 03:10:22PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:51:22PM +0200, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
...
> > Yes, it's up to 84 characters long, but I think it improves readability.
>
> In all the previous cases though, shouldn't checkpatch.pl generate errors?
No, much earlier than 100 characters relaxed limit was introduced, checkpatch
stopped complaining on long string literals.
> I didn't notice that they were below 80 chars and I never checked more
> because checkpatch.pl didn't say anything...
Exactly! This is old (6+ years?) feature.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists