linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/321] 6.1.107-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1919e08445a.c252539b484915.5023963413874535346@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 17:37:07 +0530
From: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>
To: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "stable" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, "patches" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"akpm" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "linux" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	"shuah" <shuah@...nel.org>, "patches" <patches@...nelci.org>,
	"lkft-triage" <lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"pavel" <pavel@...x.de>, "jonathanh" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
	"f.fainelli" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"sudipm.mukherjee" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
	"srw" <srw@...dewatkins.net>, "rwarsow" <rwarsow@....de>,
	"conor" <conor@...nel.org>, "allen.lkml" <allen.lkml@...il.com>,
	"broonie" <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"Kernel CI - Regressions" <kernelci-regressions@...labora.com>,
	"Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>,
	"Jeny Sheth" <jeny.sadadia@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/321] 6.1.107-rc1 review

 ---- On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 20:05:08 +0530  Greg Kroah-Hartman  wrote --- 
 > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.107 release.
 > There are 321 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
 > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
 > let me know.
 > 
 > Responses should be made by Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:37:36 +0000.
 > Anything received after that time might be too late.
 > 
 > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
 >     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.107-rc1.gz
 > or in the git tree and branch at:
 >     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
 > and the diffstat can be found below.
 > 

Hi,

Please find the KernelCI report below :-


OVERVIEW

    Builds: 25 passed, 2 failed

    Boot tests: 412 passed, 0 failed

    CI systems: broonie, maestro

REVISION

    Commit
        name: v6.1.106-322-gb9218327d235
        hash: b9218327d235d21e2e82c8dc6a8ef4a389c9c6a6
    Checked out from
        https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y


BUILDS

    Failures
      -i386 (tinyconfig)
      Build detail: https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/build/build?orgId=1&var-id=maestro:66cdf1fffb8042744d0f1923
      Build error: kernel/rcu/rcu.h:218:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kmem_dump_obj’; did you mean ‘mem_dump_obj’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      -x86_64 (tinyconfig)
      Build detail: https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/build/build?orgId=1&var-id=maestro:66cdf200fb8042744d0f192a
      Build error: kernel/rcu/rcu.h:218:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kmem_dump_obj’; did you mean ‘mem_dump_obj’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      CI system: maestro


BOOT TESTS

No new boot failures found

See complete and up-to-date report at:

    https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/revision/revision?orgId=1&var-git_commit_hash=b9218327d235d21e2e82c8dc6a8ef4a389c9c6a6&var-patchset_hash=


Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@...nelci.org>

Thanks,
KernelCI team