lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4A2EAFA2-842F-46EF-995E-7843937E8CD5@toblux.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:29:34 +0200
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 dhowells@...hat.com,
 jlayton@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] fscache: Remove duplicate included header

On 28. Jun 2024, at 10:44, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:23:30 +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote:
>> Remove duplicate included header file linux/uio.h
>> 
>> 
> 
> Applied to the vfs.netfs branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree.
> Patches in the vfs.netfs branch should appear in linux-next soon.
> 
> Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a
> new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it.
> 
> It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the
> patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated.
> 
> Note that commit hashes shown below are subject to change due to rebase,
> trailer updates or similar. If in doubt, please check the listed branch.
> 
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git
> branch: vfs.netfs
> 
> [1/1] fscache: Remove duplicate included header
>      https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/5094b901bedc

Hi Christian,

I just noticed that this patch never made it into linux-next and I 
can't find it in the vfs.netfs branch either. Any ideas?

Thanks,
Thorsten

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ