linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] KVM: Use dedicated mutex to protect kvm_usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZtHPusyTNkQ_a1Y-@google.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 06:57:14 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: "zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn" <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>, 
	"oliver.upton@...ux.dev" <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, "chenhuacai@...nel.org" <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, 
	"maobibo@...ngson.cn" <maobibo@...ngson.cn>, "palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>, 
	"maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>, "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, 
	"anup@...infault.org" <anup@...infault.org>, "paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, 
	"aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>, 
	"kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	"loongarch@...ts.linux.dev" <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>, 
	"kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] KVM: Use dedicated mutex to protect
 kvm_usage_count to avoid deadlock

On Fri, Aug 30, 2024, Kai Huang wrote:
> 
> > Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
> > Acked-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
> > 
> 
> Hmm I must have done a lot for me to receive two credits (and for most patches
> in this series) :-)
> 
> I think one Reviewed-by tag is good enough :-)

Heh, indeed.  b4 has made me very lazy; I just `b4 am` the patches and let b4
grab all the trailers.  I'm guessing something went awry in that flow (or maybe
you acked a previous version or something?)

Anyways, one of Paolo or I can clean this up when applying, assuming we remember
to do so...