linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] KVM: Use dedicated mutex to protect kvm_usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7aa6ab47-2492-43f3-bf4f-ea50e2464894@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 12:48:47 +1200
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
CC: "zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn" <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>,
	"oliver.upton@...ux.dev" <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, "chenhuacai@...nel.org"
	<chenhuacai@...nel.org>, "maobibo@...ngson.cn" <maobibo@...ngson.cn>,
	"palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>, "maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>,
	"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "anup@...infault.org"
	<anup@...infault.org>, "paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	"aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, "Gao, Chao"
	<chao.gao@...el.com>, "kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org"
	<kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "loongarch@...ts.linux.dev"
	<loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>, "kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev"
	<kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org"
	<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, "Chen, Farrah" <Farrah.Chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] KVM: Use dedicated mutex to protect
 kvm_usage_count to avoid deadlock



On 31/08/2024 1:57 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024, Kai Huang wrote:
>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
>>> Acked-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
>>>
>>
>> Hmm I must have done a lot for me to receive two credits (and for most patches
>> in this series) :-)
>>
>> I think one Reviewed-by tag is good enough :-)
> 
> Heh, indeed.  b4 has made me very lazy; I just `b4 am` the patches and let b4
> grab all the trailers.  

That's what I was thinking about too.

> I'm guessing something went awry in that flow (or maybe
> you acked a previous version or something?)

Anyway will pay more attention to this.  Thanks!