lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7a985b4-d22f-4918-a837-893c4e7efe05@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 16:44:22 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	krzk@...nel.org, jic23@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 RESEND] net: dsa: Simplify with scoped for
 each OF child loop

On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 03:00:37PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2 RESNED:
> - Remove the goto.
> - next -> net-next
> ---
>  net/dsa/dsa.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> index 668c729946ea..24f566838621 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> @@ -1264,9 +1264,8 @@ static int dsa_port_parse_of(struct dsa_port *dp, struct device_node *dn)
>  static int dsa_switch_parse_ports_of(struct dsa_switch *ds,
>  				     struct device_node *dn)
>  {
> -	struct device_node *ports, *port;
> +	struct device_node *ports;
>  	struct dsa_port *dp;
> -	int err = 0;

Why?


Patches should be small, simple, obviously correct. This change makes
the patch more complex, harder to review, and less obviously correct.

All these patches have questionable value. Most probably don't fix
anything which is broken. They are using up a lot of
Reviewer/Maintainer time. Don't make it worse by making unneeded
changes.

    Andrew

---
pw-bot: cr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ