linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH v5? 0/6] Tweaked basic Synopsys DW HDMI QP TX driver for Rockchip RK3588

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240830175440.2596-1-shimrrashai@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:54:40 -0500
From: Shimrra Shai <shimrrashai@...il.com>
To: cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com
Cc: Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
	aarnoud@...com,
	airlied@...il.com,
	algea.cao@...k-chips.com,
	andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
	andy.yan@...k-chips.com,
	conor+dt@...nel.org,
	daniel@...ll.ch,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	heiko@...ech.de,
	hjc@...k-chips.com,
	jernej.skrabec@...il.com,
	jonas@...boo.se,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	ldearquer@...il.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
	markyao0591@...il.com,
	mripard@...nel.org,
	neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
	rfoss@...nel.org,
	robh@...nel.org,
	s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
	shimrrashai@...il.com,
	tzimmermann@...e.de
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v5? 0/6] Tweaked basic Synopsys DW HDMI QP TX driver for Rockchip RK3588

Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> Please stop doing this!
>
> I appreciate your intention to help, but this is not the proper way of
> doing it.  This is a work-in-progress series and you should have asked
> before taking over.  Please do not interfere with other people's work
> without having a preliminary agreement with the author(s).
>
> Additionally, before submitting any other patches, you should get
> familiar with the process - see [1] for a starting point.
>

Hi Cristian,

Sorry, I did not know what the rules/norms/customs were around this
kind of thing here as I figured it was an open contribution space. I
did not know that I should have asked for agreement with you
beforehand. So go ahead and ignore this patch series if it goes
against the rules/customs. Even more if these points have already been
addressed, as redundant work is obviously not helpful.

That said, if there is some way to help along this project "the right
way", I would like to for sure! Just tell me what you'd _really_ need
help/assistance with to get this moved ahead and I'll see if I can
give it.

Thank you!

- Shimrra

(BTW, I thought I read a lot of that stuff in your [1], but I guess I
glossed over some of the finest details; unfortunately my mind tends
to do that a lot [drop details], so I will not contest your complaint
about the substance of the submission as containing mistakes, either.

And I only think I submitted one other patch before so I am not very
experienced at this group, despite being much more experienced with
coding. So again I apologize.)