linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] LoongArch: vDSO: Wire up getrandom() vDSO implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57d648ed2143df2f5951f8e972cc4c3b2d40c46a.camel@xry111.site>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 17:05:38 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>, Huacai Chen
 <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,  WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
 linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>, Arnd
 Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Christophe
 Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] LoongArch: vDSO: Wire up getrandom() vDSO
 implementation

On Thu, 2024-08-29 at 16:44 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > So get_vdso_data() + VVAR_LOONGARCH_PAGES_START * PAGE_SIZE should have
> > already "jumped over" the time-ns vdso data.
> 
> Oh good. Thanks for checking. So it sounds like there's just Huacai's
> set of comments and we're good.

Both Huacai and I (we've discussed a little off the list) think it seems
more natural to separate the implementation and the self test into two
patches.  Do you think it's acceptable?  If not we can live with one
consolidated patch though.

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University