[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ebff7e4c-a561-4c61-a40d-f1905ac3d42a@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 08:06:26 +0800
From: Wu Bo <wubo.oduw@...il.com>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>, Wu Bo <bo.wu@...o.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: armada8k: change to use devm_clk_get_enabled()
helper
On 2024/8/27 14:44, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Wu Bo,
>
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 at 07:55, Wu Bo <bo.wu@...o.com> wrote:
>> Use devm_clk_get_enabled() instead of devm_clk_get() to make the code
>> cleaner and avoid calling clk_disable_unprepare()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <bo.wu@...o.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c | 36 ++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c
>> index b5c599ccaacf..e7ef6c2641b8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c
>> @@ -284,23 +284,17 @@ static int armada8k_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> pcie->pci = pci;
>>
>> - pcie->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
>> + pcie->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, NULL);
>> if (IS_ERR(pcie->clk))
>> - return PTR_ERR(pcie->clk);
>> -
>> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> -
>> - pcie->clk_reg = devm_clk_get(dev, "reg");
>> - if (pcie->clk_reg == ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER)) {
>> - ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> - goto fail;
>> - }
I don't know much about this device. But from the code here, its
previous logic is that the function will only return when the error code
is EPROBE_DEFER, and other errors will continue to execute.
So I followed the previous logic, is it correct?
>> - if (!IS_ERR(pcie->clk_reg)) {
>> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk_reg);
>> - if (ret)
>> - goto fail_clkreg;
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie->clk),
>> + "could not enable clk\n");
>> +
>> + pcie->clk_reg = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "reg");
>> + if (IS_ERR(pcie->clk_reg)) {
>> + ret = dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie->clk_reg),
>> + "could not enable reg clk\n");
>> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + goto out;
> You can drop this check as dev_err_probe handle this inside
> It will defer the enabling of clock.
>> }
>>
>> /* Get the dw-pcie unit configuration/control registers base. */
>> @@ -308,12 +302,12 @@ static int armada8k_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, base);
>> if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base)) {
>> ret = PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
>> - goto fail_clkreg;
>> + goto out;
>> }
>>
>> ret = armada8k_pcie_setup_phys(pcie);
>> if (ret)
>> - goto fail_clkreg;
>> + goto out;
>>
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
>>
>> @@ -325,11 +319,7 @@ static int armada8k_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> disable_phy:
>> armada8k_pcie_disable_phys(pcie);
>> -fail_clkreg:
>> - clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk_reg);
>> -fail:
>> - clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
>> -
>> +out:
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
> Thanks
> -Anand
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists