linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] powerpc/vdso: Wire up getrandom() vDSO implementation on PPC64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZtXE-AISB4w9U9Yc@zx2c4.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 16:00:24 +0200
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
	Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org>,
	Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] powerpc/vdso: Wire up getrandom() vDSO
 implementation on PPC64

On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 03:12:47PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 02/09/2024 à 14:41, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 02:04:42PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>   SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_chacha20_blocks_nostack)
> >>   #ifdef __powerpc64__
> >> -	blr
> >> +	std	r5, -216(r1)
> >> +
> >> +	std	r14, -144(r1)
> >> +	std	r15, -136(r1)
> >> +	std	r16, -128(r1)
> >> +	std	r17, -120(r1)
> >> +	std	r18, -112(r1)
> >> +	std	r19, -104(r1)
> >> +	std	r20, -96(r1)
> >> +	std	r21, -88(r1)
> >> +	std	r22, -80(r1)
> >> +	std	r23, -72(r1)
> >> +	std	r24, -64(r1)
> >> +	std	r25, -56(r1)
> >> +	std	r26, -48(r1)
> >> +	std	r27, -40(r1)
> >> +	std	r28, -32(r1)
> >> +	std	r29, -24(r1)
> >> +	std	r30, -16(r1)
> >> +	std	r31, -8(r1)
> >>   #else
> >>   	stwu	r1, -96(r1)
> >>   	stw	r5, 20(r1)
> >> +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__
> >>   	stmw	r14, 24(r1)
> >> +#else
> >> +	stw	r14, 24(r1)
> >> +	stw	r15, 28(r1)
> >> +	stw	r16, 32(r1)
> >> +	stw	r17, 36(r1)
> >> +	stw	r18, 40(r1)
> >> +	stw	r19, 44(r1)
> >> +	stw	r20, 48(r1)
> >> +	stw	r21, 52(r1)
> >> +	stw	r22, 56(r1)
> >> +	stw	r23, 60(r1)
> >> +	stw	r24, 64(r1)
> >> +	stw	r25, 68(r1)
> >> +	stw	r26, 72(r1)
> >> +	stw	r27, 76(r1)
> >> +	stw	r28, 80(r1)
> >> +	stw	r29, 84(r1)
> >> +	stw	r30, 88(r1)
> >> +	stw	r31, 92(r1)
> >> +#endif
> >> +#endif
> > 
> > This confuses me. Why are you adding code to the !__powerpc64__ branch
> > in this commit? (Also, why does stmw not work on LE?)
> 
> That's for the VDSO32 ie running 32 bits binaries on a 64 bits kernel.
> 
> "Programming Environments Manual for 32-Bit Implementations of the 
> PowerPC™ Architecture" say: In some implementations operating with 
> little-endian byte order, execution of an lmw or stmw instruction
> causes the system alignment error handler to be invoked
> 
> And GCC doesn't like it either:
> 
> tools/arch/powerpc/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha.S:84: Error: `stmw' invalid 
> when little-endian

Does it make sense to do all the 32-bit stuff in the PPC32 commit (and
then you can introduce the selftests there without the error you
mentioned), and then add the 64-bit stuff in this commit?