[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240902152755.GFZtXZe5FPSfjRa9u3@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 17:27:55 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Daniel Ferguson <danielf@...amperecomputing.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] efi/cper: align ARM CPER type with UEFI 2.9A/2.10
specs
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 08:28:55AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Up to UEFI spec 2.9, the type byte of CPER struct for ARM processor
> was defined simply as:
>
> Type at byte offset 4:
>
> - Cache error
> - TLB Error
> - Bus Error
> - Micro-architectural Error
> All other values are reserved
>
> Yet, there was no information about how this would be encoded.
>
> Spec 2.9A errata corrected it by defining:
>
> - Bit 1 - Cache Error
> - Bit 2 - TLB Error
> - Bit 3 - Bus Error
> - Bit 4 - Micro-architectural Error
> All other values are reserved
>
> That actually aligns with the values already defined on older
> versions at N.2.4.1. Generic Processor Error Section.
>
> Spec 2.10 also preserve the same encoding as 2.9A.
>
> Adjust CPER and GHES handling code for both generic and ARM
> processors to properly handle UEFI 2.9A and 2.10 encoding.
>
> Link: https://uefi.org/specs/UEFI/2.10/Apx_N_Common_Platform_Error_Record.html#arm-processor-error-information
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 15 ++++++----
> drivers/firmware/efi/cper-arm.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
> include/linux/cper.h | 10 +++----
> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
How was this thing ever tested?!?!
Geez.
drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c: In function ‘ghes_handle_arm_hw_error’:
drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c:565:34: error: implicit declaration of function ‘FIELD_GET’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
565 | FIELD_GET(CPER_ARM_ERR_TYPE_MASK, err_info->type),
| ^~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244: drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.o] Error 1
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:485: drivers/acpi/apei] Error 2
make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:485: drivers/acpi] Error 2
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:485: drivers] Error 2
make[1]: *** [/mnt/kernel/kernel/2nd/linux/Makefile:1925: .] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:224: __sub-make] Error 2
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists