linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 01/11] PCI: imx6: Fix establish link failure in EP mode for iMX8MM and iMX8MP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240902225921.GA232316@bhelgaas>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 17:59:21 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/11] PCI: imx6: Fix establish link failure in EP
 mode for iMX8MM and iMX8MP

On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 06:51:36PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 04:12:40PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 04:18:08PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > > From: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> >
> > Maybe "iMX8MP" in this subject should be "i.MX8MP" as in the subject
> > of the next patch?
> >
> > And if so, maybe it should be "i.MX8MM" here, too?
> 
> i.MX8MP and i.MX8MM is more formal. Many other place in kernel tree also
> use iMX8MP and iMX8MM.
> 
> Do you need me repost it?

No, no point it that, we can tidy that easily.

Same for the stable tag, we can add that.