linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] erofs: use kmemdup_nul in erofs_fill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ql2vdd74fzsfzgxixa3hymagvo42dfnawpr53jgximuh7cwra6@2gn4skmbqkhz>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:46:17 +0800
From: Yiyang Wu <toolmanp@...p.cc>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] erofs: use kmemdup_nul in erofs_fill_symlink

On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 03:11:45PM GMT, Gao Xiang wrote:

> 
> 
> On 2024/9/2 15:00, Yiyang Wu via Linux-erofs wrote:
> > Remove open coding in erofs_fill_symlink.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240425222847.GN2118490@ZenIV
> > Signed-off-by: Yiyang Wu <toolmanp@...p.cc>
> > ---
> >   fs/erofs/inode.c | 12 +++++-------
> >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/erofs/inode.c b/fs/erofs/inode.c
> > index 419432be3223..d051afe39670 100644
> > --- a/fs/erofs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/erofs/inode.c
> > @@ -188,22 +188,20 @@ static int erofs_fill_symlink(struct inode *inode, void *kaddr,
> >   		return 0;
> >   	}
> > -	lnk = kmalloc(inode->i_size + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> > -	if (!lnk)
> > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> >   	m_pofs += vi->xattr_isize;
> >   	/* inline symlink data shouldn't cross block boundary */
> >   	if (m_pofs + inode->i_size > bsz) {
> > -		kfree(lnk);
> >   		erofs_err(inode->i_sb,
> >   			  "inline data cross block boundary @ nid %llu",
> >   			  vi->nid);
> >   		DBG_BUGON(1);
> >   		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> >   	}
> > -	memcpy(lnk, kaddr + m_pofs, inode->i_size);
> > -	lnk[inode->i_size] = '\0';
> > +
> > +	lnk = kmemdup_nul(kaddr + m_pofs, inode->i_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +
> 
> Unnecessary new line.
> 
> Also I wonder if it's possible to just
> 	inode->i_link = kmemdup_nul(kaddr + m_pofs, inode->i_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> 	if (!inode->i_link)
> 		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> here, and get rid of variable lnk.
> 
> Otherwise it looks good to me.
> 
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
>  
Yeah, it looks good to me. Fixed.
> > +	if (!lnk)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> >   	inode->i_link = lnk;
> >   	inode->i_op = &erofs_fast_symlink_iops;
> 

Best Regards,
Yiyang Wu