[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240902093222.2828345-3-d-gole@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:02:22 +0530
From: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar
<viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
<bb@...com>, <vibhore@...com>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Make the AM625 efuse_offset 0
Since the efuse_offset is basically derived from the syscon node, we no
longer need to use any efuse_offset for AM625. This is in line with how
the AM62Ax and AM62Px are already doing.
Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
index ba621ce1cdda..98e320832f78 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static const struct soc_device_attribute k3_cpufreq_soc[] = {
static struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data am625_soc_data = {
.efuse_xlate = am625_efuse_xlate,
- .efuse_offset = 0x0018,
+ .efuse_offset = 0x0,
.efuse_mask = 0x07c0,
.efuse_shift = 0x6,
.rev_offset = 0x0014,
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists