[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Me0OBPTneoB5WGa72eL_Yu=1=X_yu3nFimsDKUv2X56Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 12:32:59 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@....com>, Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@....com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, opensource.kernel@...o.com,
Rong Qianfeng <rongqianfeng@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] gpio: zynq: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enabled()
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 2:17 PM Rong Qianfeng <rongqianfeng@...o.com> wrote:
>
> Use devm_clk_get_enabled() simplify zynq_gpio_probe() and zynq_gpio_remove().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rong Qianfeng <rongqianfeng@...o.com>
> ---
Michal,
This changes the order of operations in remove(), could you test it or
at least give your Ack here?
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists