[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtWnd8bmiu-M4fQg@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 14:54:31 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tyrone Ting <warp5tw@...il.com>
Cc: avifishman70@...il.com, tmaimon77@...il.com, tali.perry1@...il.com,
venture@...gle.com, yuenn@...gle.com, benjaminfair@...gle.com,
andi.shyti@...nel.org, wsa@...nel.org, rand.sec96@...il.com,
wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com, tali.perry@...oton.com,
avi.fishman@...oton.com, tomer.maimon@...oton.com,
kwliu@...oton.com, jjliu0@...oton.com, kfting@...oton.com,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] i2c: npcm: Modify the client address assignment
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 09:40:09AM +0800, Tyrone Ting wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> 於 2024年8月31日 週六 上午3:16寫道:
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 11:46:38AM +0800, Tyrone Ting wrote:
> > > Store the client address earlier since it's used in the i2c_recover_bus
> > > logic flow.
> >
> > Here no explanation why it's now left-shifted by one bit.
>
> The address is stored from bit 1 to bit 7 in the register for sending
> the i2c address later.
Yes, but previously it was stored w/o that shift.
> I'll write some comments about the left-shifted by one bit behavior
> above this modification in next patch set.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists