linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add SWIG Bindings to libcpupower

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f469b5b1-a846-4add-a629-b0a415e9fcab@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 09:52:15 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "John B. Wyatt IV" <jwyatt@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.com>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
 Tomas Glozar <tglozar@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 "John B. Wyatt IV" <sageofredondo@...il.com>,
 Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add SWIG Bindings to libcpupower

On 9/4/24 08:13, John B. Wyatt IV wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 06:41:14AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 8/27/24 00:24, John B. Wyatt IV wrote:
>>> [snipped]
>>
>> Couple of things to address:
>>
>> 1. I noticed none of the patches have the subsystem prefix:
>>    pm:cpupower is the right prefix for patch subject for all
>>    the patches except the MAINTAINERS file
>>
>> I will pull the fix  "Implement dummy function for SWIG to accept
>> the full library" Patch 2 in your series.
>>
>> I want this subject changed to just fix as it is a problem irrespective
>> of SWIG - we have a missing function. Subject would be as follows:
>>
>> ""pm:cpupower: Add missing powercap_set_enabled() stub function"
>>
>> Make this the first patch in the series. I will send this up for
>> Linux 6.11-rc7 or Linux 6.12-rc1
> 
> Understood.
> 
>> Depending on how the timelines for merge window work, expect the
>> series to land in Linux 6.13-rc1. I would prefer to delay it anyway
>> so we can get some soaking in next.
> 
> Thank you, I appreciate it.
> 
> What kind of soaking are you looking for? Is there anything I can do to
> help?
> 

It is more the timing than anything you can do. We are at rc6. Please do
send the series with the changes I requested.

thanks,
-- Shuah