[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZthrAiB2j-l-V2wu@rhfedora>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 10:13:22 -0400
From: "John B. Wyatt IV" <jwyatt@...hat.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Tomas Glozar <tglozar@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"John B. Wyatt IV" <sageofredondo@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add SWIG Bindings to libcpupower
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 06:41:14AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 8/27/24 00:24, John B. Wyatt IV wrote:
>> [snipped]
>
> Couple of things to address:
>
> 1. I noticed none of the patches have the subsystem prefix:
> pm:cpupower is the right prefix for patch subject for all
> the patches except the MAINTAINERS file
>
> I will pull the fix "Implement dummy function for SWIG to accept
> the full library" Patch 2 in your series.
>
> I want this subject changed to just fix as it is a problem irrespective
> of SWIG - we have a missing function. Subject would be as follows:
>
> ""pm:cpupower: Add missing powercap_set_enabled() stub function"
>
> Make this the first patch in the series. I will send this up for
> Linux 6.11-rc7 or Linux 6.12-rc1
Understood.
> Depending on how the timelines for merge window work, expect the
> series to land in Linux 6.13-rc1. I would prefer to delay it anyway
> so we can get some soaking in next.
Thank you, I appreciate it.
What kind of soaking are you looking for? Is there anything I can do to
help?
--
Sincerely,
John Wyatt
Software Engineer, Core Kernel
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists