linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] fuse: basic support for idmapped mounts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEivzxds=dcwr5TzVdToDwWNnUGRUVi9hLsg4bJX0OMigxvPMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 19:21:19 +0200
From: Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, mszeredi@...hat.com, stgraber@...raber.org, 
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Seth Forshee <sforshee@...nel.org>, 
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, German Maglione <gmaglione@...hat.com>, 
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, Bernd Schubert <bschubert@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] fuse: basic support for idmapped mounts

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 7:00 PM Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 4 Sept 2024 at 17:29, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 05:15:40PM GMT, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > On Tue, 3 Sept 2024 at 17:16, Alexander Mikhalitsyn
> > > <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear friends,
> > > >
> > > > This patch series aimed to provide support for idmapped mounts
> > > > for fuse & virtiofs. We already have idmapped mounts support for almost all
> > > > widely-used filesystems:
> > > > * local (ext4, btrfs, xfs, fat, vfat, ntfs3, squashfs, f2fs, erofs, ZFS (out-of-tree))
> > > > * network (ceph)
> > >
> > > Looks good.
> > >
> > > Applied with some tweaks and pushed.
> >
> > Ah, I didn't see your reply. Fwiw, if you agree with my suggestion then
> > Alex can just put that patch on top of the series or do it after we
> > landed it. I just think passing NULL 38 times is a bit ugly.
>
> Yes, I agree with this comment.   I'm fine with either a redone series
> or an incremental patch.

Dear Christian,
Dear Miklos,

I'm happy to send a patch/patches on top to refactor that.

Kind regards,
Alex

>
> Thanks,
> Miklos