[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240904073007.GA3840@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 00:30:07 -0700
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Radu Rendec <rrendec@...hat.com>,
Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@....com>, Pu Wen <puwen@...on.cn>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] x86/cacheinfo: Clean out init_cache_level()
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 09:41:40AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 08:09:13PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:16:35PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > > init_cache_level() no longer has a purpose on x86. It no longer needs to
> > > set num_leaves, and it never had to set num_levels, which was unnecessary
> > > on x86.
> > >
> > > Replace it with "return 0" simply to override the weak function, which
> > > would return an error.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.de>
> > Tested-by: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.de>
> >
> > Test was done with a system equipped with AMD Phenom II X6 1055T and
> > test kernels based on v6.11-rc5-176-g20371ba12063.
>
> FYI, the test consisted of booting the mainline kernel w/o and w/ your
> patches, checking for potential new errors/warnings in kernel log and
> checking for changes or incosistencies in information of cache
> characteristics as reported in sysfs, and by some tools (lscpu,
> lstopo, x86info) -- e.g. x86info does not use sysfs to gather cache
> information for CPUs.
Thank you very much for you review and testing!
I will post a new version with the feedback from Nikolay and Sudeep and
your tags.
BR,
Ricardo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists