[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240904102526.GBZtg1lgguu4YvxqnV@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 12:25:26 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Daniel Ferguson <danielf@...amperecomputing.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] efi/cper: align ARM CPER type with UEFI 2.9A/2.10
specs
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 06:45:49AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> It was tested on ARM, together with QEMU error injection code I'm working
> there. Currently, only GPIO and SEA notification types are supported, so
> no x86 support yet (I'm trying to add SCI too, allowing to test on x86
> as well[1]).
>
> It sounds that bitfield.h is indirectly included from
> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h when compiled on such arch.
Before you send patches, make sure you *at* *least* build-test them on the
affected architectures. I don't have to tell you this.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists