lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb1a6cd0-42aa-4452-9203-460ba768e6a0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 15:29:07 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>
To: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@...cinc.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] soc: qcom: llcc: add errata to get bank num

On 3.09.2024 8:21 AM, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> Use "num-banks" property to indicate the actual num of banks for
> errata.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
> index 8fa4ffd3a9b5..3fb45e625d82 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
> @@ -1275,12 +1275,17 @@ static int qcom_llcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto err;
>  	cfg = &cfgs->llcc_config[cfg_index];
>  
> -	ret = regmap_read(regmap, cfg->reg_offset[LLCC_COMMON_STATUS0], &num_banks);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto err;
> +	if (unlikely(!of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "num-banks", &num_banks))) {
> +		/* errata: get num of llcc banks. */
> +	} else {
> +		ret = regmap_read(regmap, cfg->reg_offset[LLCC_COMMON_STATUS0], &num_banks);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto err;
> +
> +		num_banks &= LLCC_LB_CNT_MASK;
> +		num_banks >>= LLCC_LB_CNT_SHIFT;
> +	}

Is num-banks going to be populated by the bootloader, or hardcoded?

If the latter, we may just do so in the driver, hoping no more SoCs
have this erratum..

Konrad

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ