linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Input: alps - use guard notation when acquiring mutex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240905154414.5cnp5ozwflefp36l@pali>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 17:44:14 +0200
From: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Erick Archer <erick.archer@...look.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: alps - use guard notation when acquiring mutex

On Thursday 29 August 2024 10:57:41 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Pali,
> 
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 10:13:47PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > 
> > Hello, I'm not familiar with new guards and their usage. But if this is
> > a preferred way for handling mutexes then go ahead.
> > 
> > I just looked at the code and I do not see any obvious error neither in
> > old nor in new version.
> 
> Is this a Reviewed-by or Acked-by? If neither that is fine too, just
> want to make sure.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Dmitry

Hello, I have looked at it again, and you can add my:
Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>