lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtqYfXzrJGif4zOE@google.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 22:51:57 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Erick Archer <erick.archer@...look.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: alps - use guard notation when acquiring mutex

On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 05:44:14PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 29 August 2024 10:57:41 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Pali,
> > 
> > On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 10:13:47PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hello, I'm not familiar with new guards and their usage. But if this is
> > > a preferred way for handling mutexes then go ahead.
> > > 
> > > I just looked at the code and I do not see any obvious error neither in
> > > old nor in new version.
> > 
> > Is this a Reviewed-by or Acked-by? If neither that is fine too, just
> > want to make sure.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Dmitry
> 
> Hello, I have looked at it again, and you can add my:
> Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>

Thanks Pali.

-- 
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ