[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_OVSD1DXgi_9f_H-uT7KSjMwz-FfhP=vRQvposSxv=BMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 14:35:44 -0400
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To: sikkamukul <mukul.sikka@...adcom.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, evan.quan@....com,
alexander.deucher@....com, christian.koenig@....com, airlied@...ux.ie,
daniel@...ll.ch, Jun.Ma2@....com, kevinyang.wang@....com, sashal@...nel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ajay.kaher@...adcom.com,
alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com, vasavi.sirnapalli@...adcom.com,
Bob Zhou <bob.zhou@....com>, Tim Huang <Tim.Huang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.15-v5.10] drm/amd/pm: Fix the null pointer dereference
for vega10_hwmgr
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 5:53 AM sikkamukul <mukul.sikka@...adcom.com> wrote:
>
> From: Bob Zhou <bob.zhou@....com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 50151b7f1c79a09117837eb95b76c2de76841dab ]
>
> Check return value and conduct null pointer handling to avoid null pointer dereference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Zhou <bob.zhou@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Tim Huang <Tim.Huang@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mukul Sikka <mukul.sikka@...adcom.com>
Just out of curiosity, are you actually seeing an issue? This and a
lot of the other recent NULL check patches are just static checker
fixes. They don't actually fix a known issue.
Alex
> ---
> .../drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_hwmgr.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_hwmgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_hwmgr.c
> index 10678b519..304874cba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_hwmgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_hwmgr.c
> @@ -3391,13 +3391,17 @@ static int vega10_find_dpm_states_clocks_in_dpm_table(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr, co
> const struct vega10_power_state *vega10_ps =
> cast_const_phw_vega10_power_state(states->pnew_state);
> struct vega10_single_dpm_table *sclk_table = &(data->dpm_table.gfx_table);
> - uint32_t sclk = vega10_ps->performance_levels
> - [vega10_ps->performance_level_count - 1].gfx_clock;
> struct vega10_single_dpm_table *mclk_table = &(data->dpm_table.mem_table);
> - uint32_t mclk = vega10_ps->performance_levels
> - [vega10_ps->performance_level_count - 1].mem_clock;
> + uint32_t sclk, mclk;
> uint32_t i;
>
> + if (vega10_ps == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + sclk = vega10_ps->performance_levels
> + [vega10_ps->performance_level_count - 1].gfx_clock;
> + mclk = vega10_ps->performance_levels
> + [vega10_ps->performance_level_count - 1].mem_clock;
> +
> for (i = 0; i < sclk_table->count; i++) {
> if (sclk == sclk_table->dpm_levels[i].value)
> break;
> @@ -3704,6 +3708,9 @@ static int vega10_generate_dpm_level_enable_mask(
> cast_const_phw_vega10_power_state(states->pnew_state);
> int i;
>
> + if (vega10_ps == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(!vega10_trim_dpm_states(hwmgr, vega10_ps),
> "Attempt to Trim DPM States Failed!",
> return -1);
> @@ -4828,6 +4835,9 @@ static int vega10_check_states_equal(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
>
> psa = cast_const_phw_vega10_power_state(pstate1);
> psb = cast_const_phw_vega10_power_state(pstate2);
> + if (psa == NULL || psb == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /* If the two states don't even have the same number of performance levels they cannot be the same state. */
> if (psa->performance_level_count != psb->performance_level_count) {
> *equal = false;
> @@ -4953,6 +4963,8 @@ static int vega10_set_sclk_od(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr, uint32_t value)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> vega10_ps = cast_phw_vega10_power_state(&ps->hardware);
> + if (vega10_ps == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> vega10_ps->performance_levels
> [vega10_ps->performance_level_count - 1].gfx_clock =
> @@ -5004,6 +5016,8 @@ static int vega10_set_mclk_od(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr, uint32_t value)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> vega10_ps = cast_phw_vega10_power_state(&ps->hardware);
> + if (vega10_ps == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> vega10_ps->performance_levels
> [vega10_ps->performance_level_count - 1].mem_clock =
> @@ -5239,6 +5253,9 @@ static void vega10_odn_update_power_state(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
> return;
>
> vega10_ps = cast_phw_vega10_power_state(&ps->hardware);
> + if (vega10_ps == NULL)
> + return;
> +
> max_level = vega10_ps->performance_level_count - 1;
>
> if (vega10_ps->performance_levels[max_level].gfx_clock !=
> @@ -5261,6 +5278,9 @@ static void vega10_odn_update_power_state(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
>
> ps = (struct pp_power_state *)((unsigned long)(hwmgr->ps) + hwmgr->ps_size * (hwmgr->num_ps - 1));
> vega10_ps = cast_phw_vega10_power_state(&ps->hardware);
> + if (vega10_ps == NULL)
> + return;
> +
> max_level = vega10_ps->performance_level_count - 1;
>
> if (vega10_ps->performance_levels[max_level].gfx_clock !=
> @@ -5451,6 +5471,8 @@ static int vega10_get_performance_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr, const struct pp_
> return -EINVAL;
>
> ps = cast_const_phw_vega10_power_state(state);
> + if (ps == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> i = index > ps->performance_level_count - 1 ?
> ps->performance_level_count - 1 : index;
> --
> 2.39.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists