linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 9/9] net: ibm: emac: get rid of wol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <15728806-c4cf-4e66-928e-b1dc7b487419@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 23:27:08 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jacob.e.keller@...el.com, horms@...nel.org, sd@...asysnail.net,
	chunkeey@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 9/9] net: ibm: emac: get rid of wol_irq

On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 01:15:06PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> This is completely unused.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>

Seems reasonable, since there does not appear to be any WoL
support.

However, it might be possible to wire it up? You might then need the
interrupt? This patch could then be reverted if it is actually needed.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew