linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 9/9] net: ibm: emac: get rid of wol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKxU2N_gu-_aEOZ6U1wVF4D-qw9gCCe8-0VxNvJAu9aOTc0F+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 15:28:05 -0700
From: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, 
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	jacob.e.keller@...el.com, horms@...nel.org, sd@...asysnail.net, 
	chunkeey@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 9/9] net: ibm: emac: get rid of wol_irq

On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 2:27 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 01:15:06PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > This is completely unused.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
>
> Seems reasonable, since there does not appear to be any WoL
> support.
>
> However, it might be possible to wire it up? You might then need the
> interrupt? This patch could then be reverted if it is actually needed.
I have no idea how to do so. Actually the device I have probably
doesn't support WoL. I'll leave that for someone else to figure out.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>
>     Andrew