[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9bcc708-ec17-47a6-92cd-2347de23fccd@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 08:51:38 +0100
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>, chandan.babu@...cle.com,
djwong@...nel.org, dchinner@...hat.com, hch@....de
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, catherine.hoang@...cle.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/14] xfs: make EOF allocation simpler
On 04/09/2024 19:25, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
>> index 2fa29d2f004e..c5d220d51757 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
>> @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ xfs_ialloc_ag_alloc(
>> * the exact agbno requirement and increase the alignment
>> * instead. It is critical that the total size of the request
>> * (len + alignment + slop) does not increase from this point
>> - * on, so reset minalignslop to ensure it is not included in
>> + * on, so reset alignslop to ensure it is not included in
>> * subsequent requests.
>> */
>> args.alignslop = 0;
> minor comment: Looks like this diff got leftover from previous patch
> where we cleanup minalignslop/alignslop.
Right, that comment modification belongs in the previous patch - I will
relocate.
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists