linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] dt-bindings: PCI: ti,am65: Extend for use with PVU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <afa49e82-97a9-4e6b-a129-64c7a161baa5@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 09:52:19 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
 Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
 Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
 Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>,
 Bao Cheng Su <baocheng.su@...mens.com>, Hua Qian Li
 <huaqian.li@...mens.com>, Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...mens.com>,
 Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] dt-bindings: PCI: ti,am65: Extend for use with PVU

On 05/09/2024 09:16, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 05.09.24 08:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 04/09/2024 12:00, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> +
>>> +    reg-names:
>>> +      minItems: 4
>>> +      items:
>>> +        - const: app
>>> +        - const: dbics
>>> +        - const: config
>>> +        - const: atu
>>> +        - const: vmap_lp
>>> +        - const: vmap_hp
>>> +
>>> +    memory-region:
>>
>> This also did not improve. You did not address any feedback from v3.
>>
>> Missed feedback:
>>
>> This *must* be defined in top-level.
> 
> Answered in the other reply.

I don't see anywhere answer, but regardless your binding is not an
exception. Please follow rules for every binding, not expect something
special here.

Best regards,
Krzysztof