linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: fix master is holding SCL low while ENABLE bit is disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4xm4v5gq72klvg4xk4fzpyuui7hmmh63gdoflghwmo7pvid4ub@l22jnobt6n5j>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 18:03:01 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Kimriver Liu <kimriver.liu@...ngine.com>
Cc: jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, 
	mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, jsd@...ihalf.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: fix master is holding SCL low while
 ENABLE bit is disabled

Hi Kimriver,

On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 03:47:31PM GMT, Kimriver Liu wrote:
> It was observed issuing ABORT bit(IC_ENABLE[1]) will not work when
> IC_ENABLE is already disabled.
> 
> Check if ENABLE bit(IC_ENABLE[0]) is disabled when the master is
> holding SCL low. If ENABLE bit is disabled, the software need
> enable it before trying to issue ABORT bit. otherwise,
> the controller ignores any write to ABORT bit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kimriver Liu <kimriver.liu@...ngine.com>
> 
> ---
> V5->V6: restore i2c_dw_is_master_idling() function checking
> V4->V5: delete master idling checking
> V3->V4:
>       1. update commit messages and add patch version and changelog
>       2. move print the error message in i2c_dw_xfer
> V2->V3: change (!enable) to (!(enable & DW_IC_ENABLE_ENABLE))
> V1->V2: used standard words in function names and addressed review comments
> 
> link to V1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240904064224.2394-1-kimriver.liu@siengine.com/

You've ignored all of Andy's reviews, and this is not acceptable.

You've submitted this patch three times today in a short period,
and Andy has responded to each one with the same comment, which
you continue to disregard.

You must follow up on the reviews. I will accept this patch for
now, but if you keep ignoring feedback, I will reject future
patches until you address all reviews from those taking their
time to review your changes.

Andi