lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <9fc4746b-8e9d-4a75-b966-e0906187e6b7@app.fastmail.com> Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 07:17:44 +0000 From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de> To: "Charlie Jenkins" <charlie@...osinc.com>, "Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@...aro.org>, "Ivan Kokshaysky" <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>, "Matt Turner" <mattst88@...il.com>, "Vineet Gupta" <vgupta@...nel.org>, "Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, guoren <guoren@...nel.org>, "Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, "WANG Xuerui" <kernel@...0n.name>, "Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, "James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, "Helge Deller" <deller@....de>, "Michael Ellerman" <mpe@...erman.id.au>, "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@...il.com>, "Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, "Naveen N Rao" <naveen@...nel.org>, "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, "Gerald Schaefer" <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>, "Sven Schnelle" <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, "Yoshinori Sato" <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>, "Rich Felker" <dalias@...c.org>, "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Andreas Larsson" <andreas@...sler.com>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>, "Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@...nel.org>, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>, "Muchun Song" <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@...e.cz>, "Lorenzo Stoakes" <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>, "Michal Hocko" <mhocko@...e.com>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>, "Chris Torek" <chris.torek@...il.com> Cc: Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, "linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-abi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 1/2] mm: Add personality flag to limit address to 47 bits On Thu, Sep 5, 2024, at 21:15, Charlie Jenkins wrote: > Create a personality flag ADDR_LIMIT_47BIT to support applications > that wish to transition from running in environments that support at > most 47-bit VAs to environments that support larger VAs. This > personality can be set to cause all allocations to be below the 47-bit > boundary. Using MAP_FIXED with mmap() will bypass this restriction. > > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com> I think having an architecture-independent mechanism to limit the size of the 64-bit address space is useful in general, and we've discussed the same thing for arm64 in the past, though we have not actually reached an agreement on the ABI previously. > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ enum { > WHOLE_SECONDS = 0x2000000, > STICKY_TIMEOUTS = 0x4000000, > ADDR_LIMIT_3GB = 0x8000000, > + ADDR_LIMIT_47BIT = 0x10000000, > }; I'm a bit worried about having this done specifically in the personality flag bits, as they are rather limited. We obviously don't want to add many more such flags when there could be a way to just set the default limit. It's also unclear to me how we want this flag to interact with the existing logic in arch_get_mmap_end(), which attempts to limit the default mapping to a 47-bit address space already. For some reason, it appears that the arch_get_mmap_end() logic on RISC-V defaults to the maximum address space for the 'addr==0' case which is inconsistentn with the other architectures, so we should probably fix that part first, possibly moving more of that logic into a shared implementation. Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists