[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ab4c235-c513-4dce-8061-b8831ea548a3@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 11:39:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Andrei Stefanescu <andrei.stefanescu@....nxp.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski
<brgl@...ev.pl>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chester Lin <chester62515@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
Ghennadi Procopciuc <Ghennadi.Procopciuc@....com>,
Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore@....com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
NXP S32 Linux Team <s32@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drivers: gpio: siul2-s32g2: add NXP S32G2/S32G3 SoCs
support
On 06/09/2024 10:43, Andrei Stefanescu wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
>
>>> +static struct regmap *common_regmap_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>> + struct regmap_config *conf,
>>> + const char *name)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> + struct resource *res;
>>> + resource_size_t size;
>>> + void __iomem *base;
>>> +
>>> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, name);
>>> + if (!res) {
>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get MEM resource: %s\n", name);
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>>
>> There is a wrapper for both calls above, so use it.
>
> I am not sure I can change this because I also use the `resource_size`
> call below in order to initialize the regmap_config.
> Unfortunately, `devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname` doesn't also retrieve
> the resource via a pointer.
>
> I saw the `devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource` function but that one
> retrieves the resource based on the index. I would like to keep identifying
> the resource by its name instead of its index.
So add the wrapper. Or explain what's wrong with indices?
>
> Would you agree to keep the existing implementation in this case?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists