[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ba90fcf-60b8-478c-bd9d-487acacdc988@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 12:45:23 +0300
From: Andrei Stefanescu <andrei.stefanescu@....nxp.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski
<brgl@...ev.pl>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chester Lin <chester62515@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
Ghennadi Procopciuc <Ghennadi.Procopciuc@....com>,
Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore@....com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
NXP S32 Linux Team <s32@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drivers: gpio: siul2-s32g2: add NXP S32G2/S32G3 SoCs
support
On 06/09/2024 12:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/09/2024 10:43, Andrei Stefanescu wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>>
>>>> +static struct regmap *common_regmap_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>> + struct regmap_config *conf,
>>>> + const char *name)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>> + struct resource *res;
>>>> + resource_size_t size;
>>>> + void __iomem *base;
>>>> +
>>>> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, name);
>>>> + if (!res) {
>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get MEM resource: %s\n", name);
>>>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>>>
>>> There is a wrapper for both calls above, so use it.
>>
>> I am not sure I can change this because I also use the `resource_size`
>> call below in order to initialize the regmap_config.
>> Unfortunately, `devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname` doesn't also retrieve
>> the resource via a pointer.
>>
>> I saw the `devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource` function but that one
>> retrieves the resource based on the index. I would like to keep identifying
>> the resource by its name instead of its index.
>
> So add the wrapper. Or explain what's wrong with indices?
There's nothing wrong but I prefer to not force an order. I will
add a wrapper then.
Best regards,
Andrei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists