[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240906121308.5013-6-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 12:13:08 +0000
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>
CC: <joro@...tes.org>, <robin.murphy@....com>, <vasant.hegde@....com>,
<ubizjak@...il.com>, <jgg@...dia.com>, <jon.grimm@....com>,
<santosh.shukla@....com>, <pandoh@...gle.com>, <kumaranand@...gle.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/5] iommu/amd: Do not update DTE in-place in amd_iommu_set_dirty_tracking and set_dte_irq_entry
Update the DTE in place could result in data tearing since the AMD IOMMU
hardware reads the entire DTE either in two 128-bit transactions or
a single 256-bit transaction.
In case of updating only single 64-bit, it is sufficient to lock use
WRITE_ONCE() beaucse it is writing to memory read back by HW.
Also, lock the DTE before updating.
Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
---
drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
index 15eb816d4313..e9cfe9238e83 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
@@ -2753,12 +2753,12 @@ static int amd_iommu_set_dirty_tracking(struct iommu_domain *domain,
bool enable)
{
struct protection_domain *pdomain = to_pdomain(domain);
- struct dev_table_entry *dev_table;
+ struct dev_table_entry *dte;
struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data;
bool domain_flush = false;
struct amd_iommu *iommu;
unsigned long flags;
- u64 pte_root;
+ u64 new;
spin_lock_irqsave(&pdomain->lock, flags);
if (!(pdomain->dirty_tracking ^ enable)) {
@@ -2767,16 +2767,15 @@ static int amd_iommu_set_dirty_tracking(struct iommu_domain *domain,
}
list_for_each_entry(dev_data, &pdomain->dev_list, list) {
+ spin_lock(&dev_data->dte_lock);
iommu = get_amd_iommu_from_dev_data(dev_data);
-
- dev_table = get_dev_table(iommu);
- pte_root = dev_table[dev_data->devid].data[0];
-
- pte_root = (enable ? pte_root | DTE_FLAG_HAD :
- pte_root & ~DTE_FLAG_HAD);
+ dte = &get_dev_table(iommu)[dev_data->devid];
+ new = dte->data[0];
+ new = (enable ? new | DTE_FLAG_HAD : new & ~DTE_FLAG_HAD);
+ WRITE_ONCE(dte->data[0], new);
+ spin_unlock(&dev_data->dte_lock);
/* Flush device DTE */
- dev_table[dev_data->devid].data[0] = pte_root;
device_flush_dte(dev_data);
domain_flush = true;
}
@@ -3042,17 +3041,24 @@ static void iommu_flush_irt_and_complete(struct amd_iommu *iommu, u16 devid)
static void set_dte_irq_entry(struct amd_iommu *iommu, u16 devid,
struct irq_remap_table *table)
{
- u64 dte;
- struct dev_table_entry *dev_table = get_dev_table(iommu);
+ u64 new;
+ struct dev_table_entry *dte = &get_dev_table(iommu)[devid];
+ struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data = search_dev_data(iommu, devid);
+
+ if (dev_data)
+ spin_lock(&dev_data->dte_lock);
+
+ new = dte->data[2];
+ new &= ~DTE_IRQ_PHYS_ADDR_MASK;
+ new |= iommu_virt_to_phys(table->table);
+ new |= DTE_IRQ_REMAP_INTCTL;
+ new |= DTE_INTTABLEN;
+ new |= DTE_IRQ_REMAP_ENABLE;
- dte = dev_table[devid].data[2];
- dte &= ~DTE_IRQ_PHYS_ADDR_MASK;
- dte |= iommu_virt_to_phys(table->table);
- dte |= DTE_IRQ_REMAP_INTCTL;
- dte |= DTE_INTTABLEN;
- dte |= DTE_IRQ_REMAP_ENABLE;
+ WRITE_ONCE(dte->data[2], new);
- dev_table[devid].data[2] = dte;
+ if (dev_data)
+ spin_unlock(&dev_data->dte_lock);
}
static struct irq_remap_table *get_irq_table(struct amd_iommu *iommu, u16 devid)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists