[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98e7dc28-4413-4247-bad1-98b529f6d62d@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 14:25:56 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Viken Dadhaniya <quic_vdadhani@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com, quic_anupkulk@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [V1 RESEND] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Add UART node
On 27/08/2024 10:32, Viken Dadhaniya wrote:
> Add missing UART configuration for sa8775.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viken Dadhaniya <quic_vdadhani@...cinc.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi | 231 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 231 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi
> index e8dbc8d820a6..0c95a23aecec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
Please don't grow the file. At least not with above explanation. There
is no sa8775p according to what I have been just told.
We achieved consensus allowing sa8775p to stay, but now Qualcomm changes
point of view and insists on new approach of dropping sa8775p. Therefore
this change does not make much sense in the new approach.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists