linux-kernel - Re: [V1 RESEND] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Add UART node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e95b3c9c-12f1-4dc0-8bc1-db92f4b2338f@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 20:43:01 +0530
From: Viken Dadhaniya <quic_vdadhani@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>, <quic_anupkulk@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [V1 RESEND] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Add UART node

Hi Krzysztof, Thanks for review.

On 9/6/2024 5:55 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/08/2024 10:32, Viken Dadhaniya wrote:
>> Add missing UART configuration for sa8775.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viken Dadhaniya <quic_vdadhani@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi | 231 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 231 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi
>> index e8dbc8d820a6..0c95a23aecec 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi
>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> 
> 
> Please don't grow the file. At least not with above explanation. There
> is no sa8775p according to what I have been just told.
> 
> We achieved consensus allowing sa8775p to stay, but now Qualcomm changes
> point of view and insists on new approach of dropping sa8775p. Therefore
> this change does not make much sense in the new approach.
> 

Qualcomm has decided to keep current SA8775p and don’t have plan to drop 
SA8775p support. Hope you are in consensus and help with further review.
Updated commit log and Posted v2.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>