[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZuBtZuK9mJCwdvO1@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 19:01:42 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Move is_rwsem_reader_owned() and
rwsem_owner() under CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:47:17AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 9/10/24 04:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:15:54AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 02:29:05PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > > > Both is_rwsem_reader_owned() and rwsem_owner() are currently only used when
> > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS is defined. This causes a compilation error with clang
> > > > when `make W=1` and CONFIG_WERROR=y:
> > > >
> > > > kernel/locking/rwsem.c:187:20: error: unused function 'is_rwsem_reader_owned' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> > > > 187 | static inline bool is_rwsem_reader_owned(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > kernel/locking/rwsem.c:271:35: error: unused function 'rwsem_owner' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> > > > 271 | static inline struct task_struct *rwsem_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >
> > > > Fix this by moving these two functions under the CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS define.
> > > At least this solves my issue,
> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > ...and
> >
> > Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Thanks for the testing.
>
> No functional change is intended for this patch. Ingo & Peter, can this
> patch lands in v6.12 or has to wait until v6.13?
I see it already in PeterZ's tree.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists