[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PA4PR04MB96389B2CC16060957878D0D3D19A2@PA4PR04MB9638.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 06:18:57 +0000
From: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@....com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
CC: "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"briannorris@...omium.org" <briannorris@...omium.org>, "kvalo@...nel.org"
<kvalo@...nel.org>, "francesco@...cini.it" <francesco@...cini.it>, Pete Hsieh
<tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: mwifiex: avoid AP and STA running on
different channel
> From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2024 2:07 PM
> To: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@....com>
> Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> briannorris@...omium.org; kvalo@...nel.org; francesco@...cini.it; Pete
> Hsieh <tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com>
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: mwifiex: avoid AP and STA running on
> different channel
>
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
> opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report
> this email' button
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 05:56:58AM +0000, David Lin wrote:
> > > From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2024 1:56 PM
> > > To: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@....com>
> > > Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > > briannorris@...omium.org; kvalo@...nel.org; francesco@...cini.it;
> > > Pete Hsieh <tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com>
> > > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: mwifiex: avoid AP and STA
> > > running on different channel
> > >
> > > Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking
> > > links or opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message
> > > using the 'Report this email' button
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 01:55:14AM +0000, David Lin wrote:
> > > > > From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2024 4:33 AM
> > > > > To: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@....com>
> > > > > Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org;
> > > > > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; briannorris@...omium.org;
> > > > > kvalo@...nel.org; francesco@...cini.it; Pete Hsieh
> > > > > <tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: mwifiex: avoid AP and
> > > > > STA running on different channel
> > > > >
> > > > > Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when
> > > > > clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt, report the
> > > > > message using the 'Report this email' button
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 10:35:01AM +0000, David Lin wrote:
> > > > > > > From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, September 2, 2024 5:38 PM
> > > > > > > To: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@....com>
> > > > > > > Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org;
> > > > > > > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; briannorris@...omium.org;
> > > > > > > kvalo@...nel.org; francesco@...cini.it; Pete Hsieh
> > > > > > > <tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com>
> > > > > > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: mwifiex: avoid AP and
> > > > > > > STA running on different channel
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 04:43:11PM +0800, David Lin wrote:
> > > > > > > > Current firmware doesn't support AP and STA running on
> > > > > > > > different channels simultaneously.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As mentioned here:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A
> > > > > > > %2F%
> > > > > > >
> > >
> 2Flo%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cyu-hao.lin%40nxp.com%7Cd0a1e3797a0d4acd7a
> > > > > > >
> > >
> 9c08dcd15d3ddb%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638
> > > 6
> > > > > > >
> > >
> 15445620612026%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJ
> > > QI
> > > > > > >
> > >
> joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5yC
> > > > > > >
> jjIqxpV%2BJxlPdrCH0gRTQ%2FCQZKr%2FDc0S1cjkaIA8%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> re.kern%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cyu-hao.lin%40nxp.com%7C7712df39ac37414fd
> > > > > a7
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> e08dcd10eac35%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6386
> > > > > 15108
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> 157502805%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV
> > > > > 2luMz
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> IiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=URNJPJE17iRY
> > > > > Tu4i
> > > > > > > rx7eQAC97tE5OE6a4kUfjUwuaVU%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> el.org%2Fall%2FZtGnWC7SPHt7Vbbp%40pengutronix.de%2F&data=05%7C02%
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> 7Cyu-hao.lin%40nxp.com%7Cce9b7d4e417c41113c7d08dccb32fc49%7C686ea
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> 1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638608667089710854%7CUnkn
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1h
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> aWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nMZO565xCUO%2BwxD4tIfi
> > > > > > > w6cGyYrinaEsi7XLfqyxgXg%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > AP and STA can indeed have different channels when DRCS is
> > > > > > > enabled, so I think you have to check this in your patch.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Maybe the same question here again: Wouldn't it make sense
> > > > > > > to enable DRCS by default?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sascha
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will look into DRCS support later after current tasks on hand.
> > > > > > This patch is a quick fix to avoid firmware crash in the specific
> scenario.
> > > > >
> > > > > With DRCS support enabled AP and STA actually can run on
> > > > > different channels with the current code. You are breaking this
> > > > > scenario with this
> > > patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sascha
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > DRCS will be checked in the future.
> > >
> > > By future you mean v3 of this patch?
> > >
> > > Sascha
> > >
> >
> > No schedule now.
>
> I am getting confused now. You want us to abandon my patch in favour of yours,
> but you have no plans to update your patch to avoid a regression that you
> introduce with your patch?
>
> Sascha
>
My patch resolves the same issue as your patch. But your patch can't let AP and STA run on the same channel if some wiphy parameters are set.
I wonder did you test your patch?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists