[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46fc455c-385c-44fb-b194-0fd046f6d21c@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 23:57:05 -0700
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
To: Shen Lichuan <shenlichuan@...o.com>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
apparmor@...ts.ubuntu.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] security/apparmor: remove duplicate unpacking in
unpack_perm function
On 8/21/24 00:22, Shen Lichuan wrote:
> The code was unpacking the 'allow' parameter twice.
> This change removes the duplicate part.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shen Lichuan <shenlichuan@...o.com>
NAK, this would break the unpack. The first entry is actually a reserved
value and is just being thrown away atm. Instead of double unpacking to
perms->allow we could unpack it to a temp variable that just gets discarded
> ---
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
> index 5a570235427d..4ec1e1251012 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
> @@ -649,7 +649,6 @@ static bool unpack_perm(struct aa_ext *e, u32 version, struct aa_perms *perm)
> return false;
>
> return aa_unpack_u32(e, &perm->allow, NULL) &&
> - aa_unpack_u32(e, &perm->allow, NULL) &&
> aa_unpack_u32(e, &perm->deny, NULL) &&
> aa_unpack_u32(e, &perm->subtree, NULL) &&
> aa_unpack_u32(e, &perm->cond, NULL) &&
Powered by blists - more mailing lists